Friday, May 2, 2008

Anne Frank BLog question number 5 the "i: question (Why might the writers have chosen to change or invent these details? DO you think it’s acceptable)

I think ther must be siome fictions orv parts that author had made. It is because some part, the story couold not fit. For example, if there is evidence that Anne hated Mr.Van daan but there is no evidence of why, the story doesn't match and it is no sense that Anne hates Mr.Vaan daan. So the author made up a story such as Mr.Van Dan stoled Anne's food or other things that made Anne mad. Other things could be inappropriate to show in the book or tell others pubicily and such as top secret things. It is like editing in film. When they filmed inappropriate things or miskaken, they change it. This is a true story so even the movie based on true movie such as "Fantastioc holiday(화려한 휴가)" based on the Gwangjui(Kwangju) Democraitazation movement. I think it is good way to change because the producers must keep the law or restrict area. For example, the Anne Frank's diary movie was 12years old rate and there are some sexually abuse or violence on physically or even language must be cjhange because then, if they kept all the informnation as real, it woujld have been rated 19 years old as rated r.

No comments: