Anne Frank Blog question :7 Waht do you think this play reveals about our need of freedom? ...

I think this play reveals and shows how important is freedom. The play's theme is like captured and what condition frank's were. They can't even have a freedom of bathroom during day and freedom to talk (above whisper), go out play, laugh, buy, have fun, ride bike, go to school, and even freedom to live. This play refers that while the Holocasut, not only killed but forbidden the freedom of the Jews. The play mostly shows the act while they are secret annex and it shows how bad they were without freedom. One of example is Cinderalla. Cinderalla also is treated bad and is forbidden to go to the ball to dance. She feels very restrict and she can't even have fun but only help her sisters and her step-mother. I think by watching this play, we could find that how freedom is important and how people would be without freedom.

Anne Frank Blog question number:5 Do Anne and Peter seem to have typical teenage attitudes toward their families? Go back to the text for examples to

Anne and Peter shows their teenage attitudes because first, Anne acts naughty or inmature and I think she is puberty because she is very disrespectful to everyone and have some interest in boys such as Peter. On page, 387, 2 colum, Anne says: "Remember Mr.So-and-So, rember I'm a lady" and that is very rude to say that to adult. Even Anne says naming or calling words to Peter that why did she had to meet that boy and lock up in the secret Annex.

Peter shows teenage acts toward his family and also to Frank's family. First, he doesn't finish his assignment and only cares about cat shows that he think he is old enough to handle those things. On page, 385 second colum, when Mrs.Van Daan says that Anne will be Peter's future wife, Peter gets embrassed and I think Peter is in pubertiy and shows interest in girls. In the book, Peter seems to have relationship with Anne but in the movie we saw in class, Peter seems to show lack of interest to Anne but shows lots of interest to Margot

Question number6 (I'm doing this first becasues I didn't read the text book far enough to answer question number 5 last quesrion or so)

I think that it is beasue that because people want to show how horrible it was and unfair for Jews. It is similar to Japan conquering Korea. Japan took Korea and killed so many people. I remember that my cousing saying the Japanese had lunge a dagger inside your tumbnails!!! Korea got conquered for no reason. As same, the Jews got unfairly treatyed with no reason but because they are Jews. Also, Holocasut itself wasn't just killing of Jews but it also meant that Jews are lower than other and they must be mistreated. Jews want to show how unfairly they were treated. The Holocasut not only gave physically damge but also on social, emotional, and mental damges to Jews. The Jews peopel lost their families, lost their house, always had to where or put the Star of David. Jews they self could noit accept that they are lower than others and I think that is why there are more books and movies because they want to show that the villians are not us and we are the one who got damaged.

Anne Frank BLog question number 5 the "i: question (Why might the writers have chosen to change or invent these details? DO you think it’s acceptable)

I think ther must be siome fictions orv parts that author had made. It is because some part, the story couold not fit. For example, if there is evidence that Anne hated Mr.Van daan but there is no evidence of why, the story doesn't match and it is no sense that Anne hates Mr.Vaan daan. So the author made up a story such as Mr.Van Dan stoled Anne's food or other things that made Anne mad. Other things could be inappropriate to show in the book or tell others pubicily and such as top secret things. It is like editing in film. When they filmed inappropriate things or miskaken, they change it. This is a true story so even the movie based on true movie such as "Fantastioc holiday(화려한 휴가)" based on the Gwangjui(Kwangju) Democraitazation movement. I think it is good way to change because the producers must keep the law or restrict area. For example, the Anne Frank's diary movie was 12years old rate and there are some sexually abuse or violence on physically or even language must be cjhange because then, if they kept all the informnation as real, it woujld have been rated 19 years old as rated r.